December 17, 2007

Refusing To Be Enemies: The Zeitouna Story

One Showing Only-6:30 PM, Monday, Dec. 17th. Open discussion to follow the show. All seats $5.00. More info about our group and some past presentations can be found at: here

SYNOPSIS:

A group of American women, some Jewish, and some of Arab origin (calling their group "Zeitouna"-- Arabic for "olive tree"), discuss their connections to events in Palestine/Israel. Insights form as they come to know one another, providing potential paths toward deeper understanding of this divisive issue by Americans generally, and encouragement for those trying to overcome personal prejudices, by learning to recognize the humanity of those with differing views and backgrounds.

After several years of getting to know one another through regular meetings, the women organize a group trip to Palestine/Israel, and eventually embark on an effort to share their new insights with others around the US and the world.

Director Laurie White, in addition to being a filmmaker, is a psychotherapist and a Zeitouna member. Some of White's prior movies include "Roger and Me" (co-producer), "Come Unto Me: The Faces of Tyree Guyton" (associate producer), "No Excuse" (director/producer, commissioned by the Ann Arbor Mayor's Taskforce on Increasing Safety for Women) and "Yoga from the Ground Up: the Iyengar Tradition" (director/producer).

REVIEWS:

"...a heartfelt, and sometimes heart-wrenching, effort to deal personally and locally with one of the world's most entrenched conflicts -- the Israeli-Palestinian conflict."---Patricia Montemurri, DETROIT FREE PRESS

"A moving documentary captures the fear, resentment, and anger associated with the Palestine-Israeli conflict and takes an important step toward peace and understanding."---Delia Habhab, THE ARAB AMERICAN NEWS

..."an inspiring testament to the power of dialogue and the critical role that personal transformation takes on the long road to peace." THE DETROIT JEWISH NEWS

..."an informal, grass-roots effort to build relationships across historical divides that has blossomed into something profoundly great." ---Paul Saginaw, ANN ARBOR NEWS

DETAILS:

Not rated, but suitable for young and old. 58 min. 2007 release. In English.

TRAILER:

Refusing To Be Enemies: The Zeitouna Story

November 26, 2007

Three Needles

One Showing Only-6:30 PM, Monday, Nov. 26th. Open discussion to follow the show. All seats $5.00. More info about our group and some past presentations at: here

SYNOPSIS:

A beautifully filmed, 3-continent triptych of the personal impacts of the HIV/AIDS pandemic, bringing greater relevance of this phenomenon to those of us living in a more protected environment. Starring Stockard Channing, Olympia Dukakis, Chloe Sevigny, Shawn Ashmore, Sandra Oh, and Lucy Liu.

REVIEWER'S COMMENTS:

"..director (Thom) Fitzgerald has demonstrated how huge a challenge the AIDS epidemic is on a worldwide scale, and how it will take a concerted, intelligent effort to solve it". —Allen Johnson, SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE

"Brilliant, devastating" —SAN FRANCISCO BAY GUARDIAN

"Breathtaking" —MONTREAL MIRROR

"Three riveting dramas about the AIDS crisis set in South Africa, China, and Canada that open our eyes and our hearts to victims of this dread disease". —Frederic and Mary Ann Brussat, SPIRITUALITY AND PRACTICE

AWARDS, NOMINATIONS:

2005 : Won Atlantic Canadian Award (Best Cinematography, Tom Harting) 2005: Won Atlantic Canadian Award (Best Direction, Thom Fitzgerald) 2006: Nominated for Directors Guild of Canada Craft Award, Feature Film (Outstanding Direction, Thom Fitzgerald)

DETAILS:

MPAA rating: not rated, 124 min., color, in English, 2005 release.

TRAILER:

Three Needles

October 29, 2007

Iraq In Fragments

6:30pm Monday, Oct. 29th on the Elks Theatre big screen. An open discussion will follow the show. All seats $5.00. Presented by the Voices of the Heartland Independent Film Group. More info about the group and past presentations can be found here

SYNOPSIS:

In a series of stunningly filmed sequences, Longley and his camera seek out the real lives outside the frame of conventional TV news, and he succeeds in creating both compelling journalism and superb images. In Baghdad, he finds a heartbreakingly lonely 11-year-old orphan, apprenticed to a tough garage owner who has taken him in. This man appears at first to be affectionate to the boy in his rough and ready way, and the child's hesitant voiceover pays a kind of cowed tribute to how kind he is; and yet soon the man is cuffing him and shouting at him, and in the course of the film, the boy's feelings become something altogether different. In Baghdad, in the cafes and streetcorners, the cynical talk is of how things were actually better under Saddam.

In the south, the Shias are electrified by the historic opportunity that has opened up for them, and vigorously prosecute their new Islamic revolution; we see them loudly declaiming the great Satan Uncle Sam and brutally arresting people on suspicion of selling alcohol, a suspicion that does not appear to have much relation to due process of law. These people appear drunk with righteousness, and again, the dark talk is of a rampant new Saddam-ism. Then there is a gentle, pious Kurdish man who sadly reflects that his people's religious identity has left them out of step with the fierce new flame of anger burning elsewhere in the country.

It is a superbly made film, pessimistic but not simplistic. Longley's footage of Baghdad streetlife is outstanding: he seems to capture stunning images everywhere he looks, just by pointing the camera, a dozen scorching pictures every minute, rendered hyper-real on high-definition video. It looks like an imaginary landscape from some impossibly violent and traumatised futureworld, from which the director reports back with something other than the TV newsman's redundant rhetoric of sensation or forced compassion.

REVIEWERS' COMMENTS:

'A remarkable example of the conjunction of a burningly topical and newsworthy subject with a brilliant filmmaker". --Michael Wilmington, CHICAGO TRIBUNE

"... this one demands to be seen". --Kenneth Turan, LOS ANGELES TIMES

"Of all the documentaries to come out of the current war, IRAQ IN FRAGMENTS is the least violent and perhaps the most disquieting". --Jan Stuart, NEWSDAY

"James Longley's haunting, oblique film, Iraq in Fragments, presents a collage of images, sounds and characters in an intimate, partial portrait of an unraveling nation". --A.O. Scott, NEW YORK TIMES

AWARDS AND NOMINATIONS:

2007--Nominated for Oscar (Best documentary feature) 2006--Won Best Cinematography, Directing, and Editing Awards, Sundance Film Festival 2006--Won IDA Award, International Documentary Association 2006--Won Gold Hugo Award, Chicago International Film Festival 2006--Won Nestor Almendros Award, Human Rights Watch International Film Festival

DETAILS:

MPAA rating-not rated. In Arabic and Kurdish with English subtitles. 94 min. Color. 2006 release.

TRAILER:

Iraq in Fragments

September 24, 2007

The Stone Reader

6:30pm Monday, Sept. 24th on the Elks Theatre big screen. An open discussion will follow the show. All seats $5.00. Presented by the Voices of the Heartland Independent Film Group. More info about the group and past presentations can be found here

SYNOPSIS:

"A movie for anyone who has ever loved a book". In 1972, 18-year-old Mark Moskowitz buys a novel called "The Stones of Summer" by first-time author Dow Mossman, because an enthusiastic New York Times review persuades him it is the book of a generation. Despite being an avid reader, Moskowitz can't get past the first 20 pages. Twenty-five years later, Mark re-discovers the book, and this time he can't put it down. Enthralled with its story and wonderful originality, Mark tries to buy copies for his friends and to look for other works by the author. He can't find the book. He can't find a record of the author. He can't find anyone who has heard his name, let alone read the book. The film chronicles filmmaker Mark Moskowitz’s year-long search for Dow Mossman. Pursuing answers to the literary mystery, he crisscrossed the country, meeting, among others, Robert Gottlieb, editor of Catch-22, Frank Conroy, head of the Iowa Writers’ Workshop, and critic Leslie Fiedler. Cinematic, humorous and obsessive, the journey is a wistful, powerful affirmation of reading and what it means to us.

REVIEWERS' COMMENTS:

" **** (Highest Rating)! Amazing. Stone Reader is one of the most satisfying experiences you’re likely to have in a movie theatre this year. It’s a tribute to the transforming power of reading and a reminder of the Sisyphean task that reading can be." -Wesley Morris, THE BOSTON GLOBE

"It’s rare enough when a documentary achieves cult status. Rarer still when it actually changes lives. Stone Reader, a movie about the love of reading, manages to do both." -David Ansen, NEWSWEEK

"A film about the power of literature, the obscurity of genius and the enormous demands of art. Stone Reader is a debut of enormous craft, surety and resourcefulness -- a superlative, soul-baring non-fiction work that will generate torrential word-of-mouth." -Scott Foundas, VARIETY

AWARDS AND NOMINATIONS:

2002--Won Jury Special Award, Slamdance Film Festival 2002--Won Audience Award, Slamdance Film Festival 2003--Won Philadelphia City Paper Festival of Independents Award 2003--Nominated for Truer Than Fiction Award, Independent Spirit Awards

DETAILS:

MPAA rating: PG-13 for brief strong language. 127 min. Color. In English. 2002 release.

TRAILER:

The Stone Reader

August 27, 2007

Shut Up and Sing

6:30 pm Monday, August 27th on the Elks Theatre big screen. An open discussion will follow the show. All seats $5.00. Presented by the Voices of the Heartland Independent Film Group. More info about the group and past presentations can be found here

SYNOPSIS:

The movie travels with the Dixie Chicks, from the peak of their popularity as the national-anthem-singing darlings of country music and top-selling female recording artists of all time, through the now infamous anti-Bush comment made by the group’s lead singer Natalie Maines in 2003. The film follows the lives and careers of the Dixie Chicks over a period of three years during which they were under political attack and received death threats, while continuing to live their lives, have children, and of course make music. The repercussions of their speaking out raise interesting issues concerning the status of, and respect for, free speech in these times.

REVIEW

( Joel Selvin--SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE): "Of all the unlikely casualties of the war in Iraq, the poor Dixie Chicks appear to have sacrificed their enormously successful career over an offhand remark in front of a London audience on the eve of the invasion.

"As the extraordinary documentary by renowned filmmaker Barbara Kopple, "Shut Up and Sing," makes abundantly clear, the comment was not a slip of the tongue or a misunderstood piece of media garble. Dixie Chicks vocalist Natalie Maines meant what she said and she did not try to take it back, mitigate the damage or even back away from the sentiment. But then, she's no politician. Maines had some reservations about her country's inevitable march to war in those waning days of peace in 2003 and she exercised her freedom of speech, nervous in front of a foreign audience in a country that on that very day was torn by anti-war demonstrations. She also makes it clear in this astonishingly candid, intimate film that she doesn't think she has anything to apologize for, and sisters Martie Maguire and Emily Robison, her two colleagues in the biggest-selling female vocal group of the modern era, back her up all the way. Documentary filmmakers pray for something to happen to their subjects when the cameras are rolling, and two-time Academy Award-winning documentarian Kopple struck gold when Maines told a crowd on the opening night of the band's first European tour that she was "ashamed" that President Bush was from Texas. Kopple and co-director Cecilia Peck were there to record what turned out to be a historic event.

"In the firestorm that ensued, the widespread reporting of the unplanned, informal bit of stage patter, the Dixie Chicks found themselves virtually banned from country radio in this country, alienated from the group's natural, red-state core following, and demonized by powerful, ugly forces in society. Disc jockeys collected their CDs from listeners and smashed them with a bulldozer. Kopple and Peck follow the three women through the strife, the battles with the media, backstage conferences with publicists, the moments of doubt, tears, anger and recrimination. It's all there to see, splattered in front of the cameras.

"The Chicks emerged in the late '90s with, "Wide Open Spaces," an album that would sell more than 12 million copies. A refreshing paradigm shift from the Barbie dolls out of Nashville, the Chicks played their own instruments (Maguire took third place in the National Fiddle Championship) and sprinkled authentic bluegrass amid the mainstream country music they made. Their fevered constituency was a lot of the same people who voted for Bush. Cameras catch Maines that fateful night at London's Shepherds Bush Empire and follow the Chicks through the aftermath -- the Diane Sawyer interview, the nude cover shoot for "Entertainment Weekly," the verbal sparring with redneck singer Toby Keith -- all the way through the group's 2005 collaboration with producer Rick Rubin that resulted in the Dixie Chicks' latest album, "Taking the Long Way," preceded by the defiant single, "Not Ready to Make Nice."

"By the time Maines takes the stage again (early in 2006), at the scene of the crime in Shepherds Bush and triumphantly repeats her remark, the Dixie Chicks have been made into accidental, reluctant heroes of free speech and the anti-war movement. Bush himself feels obligated to comment on them. Before the controversy, the Dixie Chicks were just an extraordinarily popular group of country music performers; now they stand for something. Here comes Oprah, Charlie Rose and the cover of Time, previously unthinkable pinnacles of media exposure for three pretty ladies singing country music. But we are living in a time where the American public must turn to entertainers and comedians, not their politicians, to hear the truth.

"(Their) recent tour, "Accidents and Accusations," ... had to be halted, postponed and re-routed away from the South -- the Houston concert was plain canceled after radio refused advertising for the show -- and into additional dates in Canada, where "The Long Way Home" is six times platinum. And the Chicks continue to be too hot button for some. NBC-TV, citing network policy against advertising controversial subjects, refused to run commercials in Los Angeles for "Shut Up and Sing."

Is this a great country or what? —Advisory: Newsreel footage of actual politicians is included".

OTHER REVIEWERS' COMMENTS:

"Barbara Kopple and Cecilia Peck's film is a fascinating look at the intersection of commerce, celebrity, and controversy"-- Wesley Morris, BOSTON GLOBE

"Their fight to stay uncompromised is inspiring"--Peter Travers, ROLLING STONE

"While there is a vague hint of a vanity project in a few extraneous scenes, directors Barbara Kopple and Cecilia Peck have fashioned a compelling and rousing film that will not only appeal to Chicks fans, but make fans of those who weren't before"--Claudia Puig, USA TODAY

"Exhilarating documentary"--Peter Bradshaw, THE GUARDIAN

AWARDS, NOMINATIONS:

2006--Won Audience Award, Aspen Filmfest 2006--Won BSFC Award, Boston Society of Film Critics 2006--Won Special Jury Prize, Chicago International Film Festival 2006--Won Wodstock Film Festival Audience Award 2006--Won SDFCS Award, San Diego Film Critics Society 2007--Nominated for BFCA Award, Broadcast Film Critics Association

DETAILS:

MPAA rating--Rated R. 93 min. 2006 release. Color

July 30, 2007

Princess Mononoke

6:30 pm Monday, July 30th on the Elks Theatre big screen. An open discussion will follow the show. All seats $5.00. Presented by the Voices of the Heartland Independent Film Group. More info about the group and past presentations can be found here

SYNOPSIS

(from Roger Ebert of the CHICAGO SUN-TIMES):

"Hayao Miyazaki is a great animator, and his PRINCESS MONONOKE is a great film. Do not allow conventional thoughts about animation to prevent you from seeing it. It tells an epic story set in medieval Japan, at the dawn of the Iron Age, when some men still lived in harmony with nature and others were trying to tame and defeat it. It is not a simplistic tale of good and evil, but the story of how humans, forest animals and nature gods all fight for their share of the new emerging order. It is one of the most visually inventive films I have ever seen.

"The movie opens with a watchtower guard spotting "something wrong in the forest." There is a disturbance of nature, and out of it leaps a remarkable creature, a kind of boar-monster with flesh made of writhing snakes. It attacks villagers, and to the defense comes Ashitaka, the young prince of his isolated people. He is finally able to slay the beast, but his own arm has been wrapped by the snakes and is horribly scarred.

"A wise woman is able to explain what has happened. The monster was a boar god, until a bullet buried itself in its flesh and drove it mad. And where did the bullet come from? "It is time," says the woman, "for our last prince to cut his hair and leave us." And so Ashitaka sets off on a long journey to the lands of the West, to find out why nature is out of joint, and whether the curse on his arm can be lifted. He rides Yakkuru, a beast that seems part horse, part antelope, part mountain goat.

"There are strange sights and adventures along the way, and we are able to appreciate the quality of Miyazaki's artistry. The drawing is not simplistic, but has some of the same "clear line" complexity used by the Japanese graphic artists of two centuries ago, who inspired such modern works as Herge's Tintin books. Nature is rendered majestically (Miyazaki's art directors journeyed to ancient forests to make their master drawings) and fancifully (as with the round little forest sprites). There are also brief, mysterious appearances of the spirit of the forest, who by day seems to be a noble beast, and at night a glowing light.

"Ashitaka eventually arrives in an area that is prowled by Moro, a wolf god, and sees for the first time the young woman named San. She is also known as "Princess Mononoke," but that's more a description than a name; a mononoke is the spirit of a beast. San was a human child, raised as a wolf by Moro; she rides bareback on the swift white spirit-wolves and helps the pack in their battle against the encroachments of Lady Eboshi, a strong ruler whose village is developing ironworking skills and manufactures weapons using gunpowder.

"As Lady Eboshi's people gain one kind of knowledge, they lose another, and the day is fading when men, animals and the forest gods all speak the same language. The lush green forests through which Ashitaka traveled west have been replaced here by a wasteland; trees have been stripped to feed the smelting furnaces, and on their skeletons, yellow-eyed beasts squat ominously. Slaves work the bellows of the forges, and lepers make the weapons.

"But all is not black and white. The lepers are grateful that Eboshi accepts them. Her people enjoy her protection. Even Jigo, a scheming agent of the emperor, has motives that sometimes make a certain amount of sense. When a nearby samurai enclave wants to take over the village and its technology, there is a battle with more than one side and more than one motive. This is more like mythical history than action melodrama.

"The artistry in PRINCESS MONONOKE is masterful. The writhing skin of the boar-monster is an extraordinary sight, one that would be impossible to create in any live-action film. The great white wolves are drawn with grace, and not sentimentalized; when they bare their fangs, you can see that they are not friendly comic pals, but animals who can and will kill.

"The movie does not dwell on violence, which makes some of its moments even more shocking, as when Ashitaka finds that his scarred arm has developed such strength that his arrow decapitates an enemy.

"Miyazaki and his collaborators work at Japan's Studio Ghibli, and a few years ago Disney bought the studio's entire output for worldwide distribution. (Disney artists consider Miyazaki a source of inspiration.) The contract said Disney could not change a frame--but there was no objection to dubbing into English, because of course, all animation is dubbed into even its source language, and as Miyazaki cheerfully observes, "English has been dubbed into Japanese for years." This version of PRINCESS MONONOKE has been well and carefully dubbed with gifted vocal talents, including Billy Crudup as Ashitaka, Claire Danes as San, Minnie Driver as Eboshi, Gillian Anderson as Moro, Billy Bob Thornton as Jigo, and Jada Pinkett-Smith as Toki, a commonsensical working woman in the village.

"The drama is underlaid with Miyazaki's deep humanism, which avoids easy moral simplifications. There is a remarkable scene where San and Ashitaka, who have fallen in love, agree that neither can really lead the life of the other, and so they must grant each other freedom, and only meet occasionally. You won't find many Hollywood love stories (animated or otherwise) so philosophical. PRINCESS MONONOKE is a great achievement and a wonderful experience, and one of the best films of the year.

"Some of my information comes from an invaluable new book, "Hayao Miyazaki: Master of Japanese Animation," by Helen McCarthy (Stone Bridge Press, $18.95)."

OTHER REVIEWERS' COMMENTS:

  • "A windswept pinnacle of its art, PRINCESS MONONOKE has the effect of making the average Disney film look like just another toy story"--Ty Burr, ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY
  • "Sheer technical virtuosity aside, where Miyazaki succeeds most enduringly is in his willingness to grant audiences their most basic intellectual due"--Gemma Files, FILM.COM
  • "A landmark achievement in animated cinema"--Scott Von Doviak, CULTUREVULTURE.NET

AWARDS AND NOMINATIONS:

2001--Won Saturn Award, US Academy of Fantasy, Sci-fi, etc. films 2000--Nominated for Annie Award 2000--Nominated for Sierra Award, Las Vegas Film Critics Society 1998--Won Best Film Award, Japanese Academy

DETAILS:

MPAA rating: PG-13 for some images of violence and gore. 134 min. Japanese film, dubbed in English. US release: 1999. Color.

June 25, 2007

Water

6:30 pm Monday, June 25th on the Elks Theatre big screen. An open discussion will follow the show. All seats $5.00. Presented by the Voices of the Heartland Independent Film Group. More info about the group and past presentations can be found here

SYNOPSIS:

The setting is India in 1938. The film examines the plight of a group of widows forced into poverty at a temple in the holy city of Varanasi. It focuses on a relationship between one of the widows, who wants to escape the social restrictions imposed on widows, and a man who is from the highest caste and a follower of Mahatma Gandhi.

This is the third film in Deepa Mehta's "elemental trilogy," which began with FIRE (1996) and continued with EARTH (1998). The feminist, anti-traditional theme of WATER resulted in a 5-year campaign by extremist groups in India to stop the film's production, including death threats, arson, and riots.

REVIEWERS' COMMENTS:

  • "Luminous" --Roger Ebert, CHICAGO SUN-TIMES
  • "A magnificent film" --Salman Rushdie
  • "Superb" --Rick Grohn, TORONTO GLOBE AND MAIL
  • "It levels its criticisms within a climate of respect, a combination that creates a work of true humanity". --Robert Denerstein, DENVER ROCKY MOUNTAIN NEWS
  • "... WATER is an exquisite film about the institutionalized oppression of an entire class of women and the way patriarchal imperatives inform religious belief". --Jeannette Catsoulis, NEW YORK TIMES

AWARDS, NOMINATIONS:

2007 --Nominated for Oscar, Best Foreign Language Film 2006--Won Genie Awards for Best Achievement in Cinematography (Giles Nuttgens), Best Achievement in Music - Original Score (Mychael Danna), Best Performance by an Actress in a Leading Role (Seema Biswas) 2006--Won Freedom of Expression Award, National board of Review, USA 2006--Won VFCC Awards, Vancouver Film Critics Circle, for Best Actress - Canadian Film (Lisa Ray), Best Director - Canadian Film (Deepa Mehta)

DETAILS:

MPAA rating--Rated PG-13 for mature thematic material involving sexual situations, and for brief drug use. In Hindi, with English subtitles. 117 min. 2005 release. In color.

May 21, 2007

Jesus Camp

6:30 pm Monday, May 21st on the Elks Theatre big screen. An open discussion will follow the show. All seats $5.00. Presented by the Voices of the Heartland Independent Film Group. More info about the group and past presentations can be found here

SYNOPSIS:

An acclaimed documentary about the camp at Devil's Lake, ND for training kids as young as 10 to be evangelical preachers. Discussion to follow the show.

REVIEWERS' COMMENTS:

  • "Grady and Ewing's depiction of this modern-day children's crusade is remarkably unbiased." --Ken Fox, TV GUIDE'S MOVIE GUIDE
  • "Often funny, but it's also a scary, sobering inside look at the attempts of an increasingly powerful group to erode the separation of church and state". --Ann Hornaday, WASHINGTON POST
  • "You don't have to be extreme or liberal to be shaken by Jesus Camp". --Phil Kloer, ATLANTA JOURNAL-CONSTITUTION
  • "This riveting documentary explores Kids on Fire, a summer camp in Devils Lake, N.D., that grooms children to be soldiers in 'God's army'." --Stephen Holden, NEW YORK TIMES

AWARDS AND NOMINATIONS:

2007--Nominated for Oscar, Best Documentary 2007--Nominated for OFCS Award, Best Documentary, Online Film Critics Society Awards 2006--Nominated for CFCA Award, Best Documentary, Chicago Film Critics Association Awards

DETAILS:

MPAA rating:PG-13 for some discussions of mature subject matter. 87 min. In English. 2006. Color.

April 30, 2007

Waco: The Rules of Engagement

One showing only. Downstairs on the big Elks Theatre screen. Open discussion to follow the show. More info about the Voices of the Heartland Independent Film Group and our past presentations can be found here

SYNOPSIS:

An expose on the draconian tactics utilized by the FBI to bring the Branch Davidian sect to heel. Utilizing footage and recordings from both sides of the standoff, the story is told of how government interference with an unconventional congregation ended in tragedy on April 19, 1993.

REVIEWERS' COMMENTS:

  • "The film is persuasive" --Roger Ebert, CHICAGO SUN-TIMES
  • "Accessible, well researched and strongly argued" --Rick Groen, GLOBEANDMAIL.COM
  • "...presents itself as neither guesswork nor conspiratorial ramblings; instead, Gazecki's ... documentary smacks of hard facts and deep research." --Marc Savlov, AUSTIN CHRONICLE
  • "A superb and very disturbing documentary" --Jon Niccum, LAWRENCE JOURNAL-WORLD

DETAILS:

MPAA: Not Rated (some graphic violence and coarse language). 135 min. 1997. In English. Color.

AWARDS AND NOMINATIONS:

Nominated for Oscar, best documentary feature, 1998. Won IDA Award, International Documentary Association, 1997. Won Most Popular Documentary Award, Melbourne International Film Festival, 1998.

March 26, 2007

why we fight

One Showing Only-6:30 PM, Monday, March 26th. Open discussion to follow the show. All seats $5.00. More info about our group and past presentations here

SYNOPSIS:

"Released as the American military continues to make its presence felt in Iraq and across the globe, Eugene Jarecki's WHY WE FIGHT asks some pertinent questions about the economic necessities of war. Speaking to a number of key figures including Republican Senator John McCain and author Gore Vidal, as well as lesser-know names such as Wilton Sekzer--a Vietnam veteran and ex-New York City cop who lost his son in the World Trade Center attacks--Jarecki's film is a bipartisan treatise that was inspired by Dwight Eisenhower's 1961 farewell address to the nation.

Eisenhower spoke of a burgeoning American military-industrial complex, which he believed would threaten democracy across the globe. Jarecki takes a look at whether this has occurred by questioning his subjects on the links between big business and the military, while also talking to people whose lives are inexorably tied to the business of war. Fascinating revelations unfold, from Sekzer's attempt to pay tribute to his son to the thoughts of the fighter pilot who dropped the first bomb on Iraq at the dawn of the second Gulf War. Each of them gives their own unique take on the American military machine, while Jarecki intersperses their discussions with rapid-fire scenes of the machine as it lumbers into action.

WHY WE FIGHT cleverly reflects the sharp divide that exists among the American people on why we are in Iraq. A number of people on the street are questioned throughout the film, with Jarecki asking them "why do we fight?" His subjects give a broad range of answers, and Jarecki himself does not search for a definitive solution to the question. Instead he simply gives us a variety of truths and lets the audience try to salvage something from an incredibly complex, sometimes mysterious, and often terrifying state of affairs". (editors, "Rottentomatoes" reviews)

OTHER REVIEWER'S COMMENTS:

  • "There is plenty here that should worry members of both political parties." --Bruce Newman, SAN JOSE MERCURY NEWS
  • "It's impossible to imagine anyone, right-leaning or left, coming away from this hugely important documentary unshaken by its representation of the United States and its military establishment." --Steven Rea, PHILADELPHIA INQUIRER
  • "Extremely timely and urgently relevant."--editors, TIME OUT
  • "Whether we've reached the critical mass of 'misplaced power' is the gist of the current national debate, and Why We Fight is a useful tool in that argument." --Jack Mathews, NEW YORK DAILY NEWS
  • "The film is a clear-headed anomaly of reason that one hopes won't get lost in the bicker-and-scream shuffle of TV punditry." --Chris Vognar, DALLAS MORNING NEWS

AWARDS, NOMINATIONS:

Grand Jury Prize winner, 2005 Sundance Film Festival. Seeds of War Prize winner, 2005 Full Frame Documentary Film Festival.

RATING, ETC.:

PG-13, for disturbing war images and some language. 98 min. 2005. In English. Color and B&W.

Trailer:

Why We Fight

or:

Why We Fight

February 2007

Balzac and the little chinese seamstress

Date, time: 6:30 PM Monday,

SYNOPSIS:

Based on the international best-seller, "Balzac and the Little Chinese Seamstress" is set in the early 1970's during the later stages of China's "Cultural Revolution," as two city-bred teenage best friends, Luo (Kun Chen) and Ma (Ye Liu), are sent to a backward mountainous region (stunning vertical scenery!) for Maoist re-education.

Sons of "reactionary intellectuals," the boys are required to perform arduous manual labor along with locals while under the supervision of the zealous village headman. Still they manage to find diversions. They save Ma's violin from destruction by claiming a Mozart lieder is actually a celebration of Chairman Mao. Because of their literacy, the headman sends them to a larger town to watch imported Albanian and North Korean communist melodramas, and then report back to the culture-starved locals. They embroider the stodgy plots with their own inventions and the villagers are entranced.

During one of these trips, the two see and fall in love with the local beauty (Xun Zhou), the daughter of the most renowned tailor in the region. They never know her name, referring to her only as "the Little Seamstress," but she captivates them with her innocence and sensuality. When they discover a hidden suitcase filled with banned books by Western writers, mostly French — Flaubert, Dumas and Balzac among them – they read these works to the Little Seamstress for hours on end in a secret meeting place. Thirsting for knowledge of the world beyond, she comes to love, in particular, Balzac and his characters.

Eventually, Luo and the seamstress become lovers, but their romance comes to an abrupt end when he is recalled home and she finds herself pregnant. Changed by her "sentimental education," the Little Seamstress ultimately finds the courage to leave her village for wider horizons. In a bittersweet coda, many years later Luo and Ma, beneficiaries of China's economic gains and enjoying considerable professional success, meet and wonder about the Little Seamstress.

DETAILS:

MPAA: Not Rated. 2002. 110 min. In Mandarin, with English subtitles.

REVIEWERS' COMMENTS:

  • "A funny, sad and absolutely lovely film." --Steven Rea, PHILADELPHIA INQUIRER
  • "Storytelling at its most poetically cinematic." --Harvey S. Karten, COMPUSERVE
  • "Beautifully photographed, Balzac is a sometimes edgy journey that lands gently, but effectively on the mind." --Larry Ratliff, SAN ANTONIO EXPRESS-NEWS
  • "Beautifully shot, delicately scored and powered by a set of heartfelt performances, it's a lyrical endeavour." --Chris Wiegand, BOXOFFICE MAGAZINE

AWARD NOMINATIONS:

Golden Globe (2003); Best Asian Film, Hong Kong Film Awards (2004); Grand Prix, flanders International Film Festival (2002); Cannes Official Selection.

January 2007

Beijing bycicle

Mon Jan 29 — 6:30pm

SYNOPSIS:

Wang Xiaoshuai's moving, emotional BEIJING BICYCLE tells the story of a young country boy, Guei (Cui Lin), who comes to the big city determined to make it. He soon finds a job as a bike messenger in which he gets a small percentage of each delivery, working hard to build up enough credit to eventually own the bike for himself. As he grows closer to his goal, the bike is stolen and ultimately winds up in the hands of Jian (Li Bin), a poor city boy who sees the bike as his only way to make friends and impress the girl he loves. With both boys claiming the bike is theirs, a series of fights ensues over what is more than just a bike--it has become a symbol of success, power, and greed in a changing country.

Lin and Bin are excellent as the two boys battling over the bike; it is heartbreaking to watch Lin keep a tight hold of the bike even as Bin and his friends beat him senseless. Cinematographer Lui Jie depicts a very different China, one that is filled with dangerous, meandering alleys and frightening poverty. The film, almost devoid of color save for a young woman's red dress and shoes, is reminiscent of Vittori De Sica's BICYCLE THIEF and Peter Yates's BREAKING AWAY; the freedom the bicycle represents overwhelms both young boys as they risk their lives to hold on to it. The film won a Silver Berlin Bear for its honest, gritty, heartfelt depiction of a Beijing that is not often seen in the West.

REVIEWER'S COMMENTS:

  • "With this masterful, flawless film, [Wang] emerges in the front ranks of China's now numerous, world-renowned filmmakers." -- Kevin Thomas, LOS ANGELES TIMES
  • "Provides an intriguing look at how the new economy has redrawn class lines in contemporary China." --Daniel Eagan, FILM JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL
  • "Nicely serves as an examination of a society in transition."--Robert W. Butler, KANSAS CITY STAR
  • "Thoughtful and exhilarating." --Glenn Lovell, SAN JOSE MERCURY

RATING,ETC.:

PG-13, for some violence and brief nudity. 2002. Mandarin, Subtitled in English. 113 min.

Newstrailer:

Beijin Bycicle — Rotten Tomatoes

Trailer:

Beijin Bycicle — IMDb

We encourage suggestions for future showings from our audience.
web design: miguel apaza studios